Demographic Inference

Current understanding

Demographic inference from genomic data allows researchers to reconstruct the population history of species — including shifts in effective population size (Ne), bottlenecks, and patterns of inbreeding — even when sampling is limited to a handful of individuals or a single genome. Two complementary approaches are increasingly applied in conservation genomics of non-model organisms: pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescent (PSMC) analysis of whole-genome heterozygosity, and runs-of-homozygosity (ROH) analysis to decompose ancient versus recent reductions in Ne.

A key methodological question is whether PSMC trajectories are robust across sequencing platforms and between sexes. Work on the endangered Cheirotonus formosanus (long-armed scarab) provides direct evidence that they are: Chien et al. 2026, Finding 1 showed that PSMC trajectories reconstructed from independently sequenced male (PacBio HiFi) and female (Illumina) genomes are nearly identical, with overlapping bootstrap intervals. This platform-agnosticism is practically important for conservation programs where only opportunistically collected samples may be available.

ROH analysis offers a complementary temporal lens. In C. formosanus, the ROH landscape is dominated by short segments (<1 Mbp), with medium-length segments (1–5 Mbp) present in some individuals but a complete absence of very long segments (>5 Mbp). As documented in Chien et al. 2026, Finding 2, this pattern is characteristic of historical bottlenecks or long-term persistence at low ancestral Ne, rather than recent consanguineous mating. The medium-length segments hint at localized recent inbreeding within demes, adding resolution that PSMC alone — which cannot reliably address the last ~10 kya — cannot provide.

Together, these two approaches illustrate a general principle: short ROH diagnose ancient demographic restriction, long ROH diagnose recent inbreeding, and PSMC captures broad multi-generational trends. Their concordance in a single endangered beetle provides a useful proof-of-concept for applying multi-method demographic inference to non-model invertebrates with limited genomic resources.

Supporting evidence

Contradictions / open disagreements

Platform concordance sample size: The PSMC comparison rests on n=2 genomes (one individual per sex, one per platform) from a single endemic population. This is a weak test; broader sampling across populations or species is needed before platform-agnosticism can be treated as a general rule.

ROH inference data quality: The ROH analysis used reduced-representation ddRAD data (n=46 individuals) rather than whole-genome resequencing. The paper acknowledges that ddRAD likely lacks sufficient coverage to fully exploit linkage information, meaning the absence of segments >5 Mbp could partly reflect data sparsity rather than true demographic history. Whole-genome resequencing of the same individuals would be needed to confirm this signal.

Tealc’s citation-neighborhood suggestions

Question copied. Paste it into the NotebookLM tab.